Internal vs. Patient-Facing Knowledge Bases: Do You Need Both?
Staff need protocols. Patients need visiting hours. Should these live in the same system? We explore the case for unified vs. separate knowledge bases.
Seyran Ghazaryan
CEO · Jan 5, 2026
The Two Audiences Problem
Healthcare organizations serve two very different information audiences:
Internal (Staff-Facing):
External (Patient-Facing):
These audiences have different needs, different languages, and critically—different security requirements.
The Case for Separate Knowledge Bases
Security First
This is non-negotiable. Clinical protocols, internal HR policies, and staff directories should NEVER be accessible to patients.
Separate knowledge bases create an air gap. Patients literally cannot access internal content because it doesn't exist in their system.
Different Languages
Staff and patients describe the same things differently.
A staff member asks: "What's the NPO protocol?" A patient asks: "What can I eat before surgery?"
A staff member asks: "What's the visitor restriction protocol?" A patient asks: "Can my family visit me?"
A staff member asks: "What's Ext. 4127?" A patient asks: "How do I reach my nurse?"
An internal knowledge base should be indexed for clinical terminology. A patient-facing one should be indexed for the way patients actually ask questions.
Different Update Cycles
Internal documents change frequently—protocols update, contacts change, policies revise. Patients don't need to see "Version 3.2 - Revised 12/15/25."
Patient-facing content should be stable, simple, and evergreen.
The Case for a Unified Platform
Single Admin Interface
Managing two completely separate systems doubles administrative overhead. A unified platform with separate knowledge bases gives you:
Analytics Across Audiences
With unified analytics, you can see:
The Right Architecture
The best approach for most healthcare organizations:
One Platform:
Separate Knowledge Bases:
Clear Boundaries:
What to Include
For Staff:
For Patients:
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Starting With Patient-Facing
Many organizations build a patient FAQ first because it's "safer." But the value is actually higher for staff-facing:
Start internal. Add patient-facing once you've proven the model.
2. Over-Restricting Staff Content
Some organizations try to hide "non-clinical" content from clinical staff. This creates friction. A nurse looking for the parking office phone number shouldn't need special access.
Default to broad internal access. Restrict only truly sensitive content.
3. Under-Investing in Patient Language
Staff can adapt to clinical terminology. Patients can't. The patient knowledge base needs plain language—not medical jargon.
The Bottom Line
You need both internal and patient-facing knowledge management. The question is whether they're unified on one platform or completely separate systems.
For most healthcare organizations, the answer is: One platform, two knowledge bases.
This gives you the security of separation with the efficiency of unified management.
---
Linkd lets you create both staff and patient knowledge bases—completely separate content, single admin interface. Start your 14-day pilot.